This dissertation explores the lived experience of mandated treatment specific to substance use related adjudication. Background information related to the rise of substance specific diversion courts within the United States is provided, as well as discussion of relevant literature from scholars within the fields of addictions, criminology, law, social justice, and human services. By utilizing a phenomenological approach and convenience sampling to uncover the lived experience of individuals participating in mandated counseling services at a community-based program serving those with a history of substance use, the author hopes to contribute to the sparse amount of qualitative research within the field of diversion court evaluation and evidence-based practice. Findings suggest that rather than solely mediating or facilitating positive outcomes within mandated treatment environments, the State instead acts primarily as a moderator of behavioral change. In response to related research which recognizes the prevalence and importance of coercion, motivation, and therapeutic alliance within mandated treatment ecology and research, the current study uncovers the experiences of these constructs through narratives centered in wanting, deserving, and belonging.
Read
